Why Trump and Tehran are both wrong about the end of the war

Why Trump and Tehran are both wrong about the end of the war

The belief that the Second Iran War is winding down is the most dangerous delusion in the Middle East right now. If you listen to the White House, the "Operation Epic Fury" strikes have already broken the back of the Islamic Republic. If you listen to the remaining leadership in Tehran, they've survived the worst and just need to outlast a President obsessed with his poll numbers. Both sides are fundamentally misreading the room.

We're currently in the fifth week of a conflict that has seen more than 2,000 strikes on Iranian soil. The assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on February 28 didn't lead to a white flag; it created a command vacuum where mid-level IRGC officers are now making autonomous, more radical decisions. Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, recently expressed "curiosity" as to why Tehran hasn't capitulated given the massive naval power on their doorstep. That curiosity is a sign of a massive intelligence failure regarding how this regime actually functions.

The capitulation myth and the survival of the bruised

Washington assumes that if you break enough centrifuges and sink enough ships, a government will eventually choose its own survival over its ideology. But for the clerical establishment, capitulation is the end of survival. To accept Trump’s 15-point proposal—which basically asks Iran to hand over its enriched uranium and abandon every regional proxy it has spent 40 years building—is to sign a death warrant for the system itself.

Tehran isn't looking for an off-ramp; they're looking for a war of attrition. They know that as long as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed, global oil prices will keep climbing. US gas prices hit a three-year high this week, and that's the only metric Tehran thinks Trump actually cares about.

  • Economic leverage: While Iran's infrastructure is smoking, they've managed to spike US diesel prices by 50%.
  • Asymmetric response: Even with two-thirds of their missile sites "destroyed" according to CENTCOM, they're still launching drone swarms that keep the IDF and US Navy on permanent high alert.
  • Domestic repression: The regime isn't just fighting a war abroad; they're fighting a civil war at home. Since the December 2025 protests, they've killed thousands of their own citizens to maintain a grip on power.

Why the military victory is a strategic trap

Trump wants to declare victory and move on. He’s already set a deadline of March 27 for a deal, threatening to hit power plants if the "Axis of Resistance" doesn't stop. But military "achievements" in a theater like Iran don't translate into political stability. You can't bomb a country into a democracy, and you certainly can't bomb a fragmented military into a coherent negotiating partner.

The current strikes have targeted the Bid Ganeh missile facility and the Modarres base, but they've also decentralized the threat. We’re now seeing fiber-optic FPV drones—technology that's incredibly hard to jam—being used by pro-Iranian militias in Iraq and Yemen. The "success" of degrading the conventional military has simply accelerated the shift toward a more unpredictable, decentralized insurgency.

The Mojtaba factor and the line of succession

With the elder Khamenei gone, the focus has shifted to his son, Mojtaba. However, there are reports of significant friction among the clerics regarding his ability to lead. While Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf is playing the role of the "rational" interlocutor with the US, he's simultaneously posting on X about "complete and remorseful punishment" for the West. It's a classic good cop, bad cop routine that masks a deeper reality: nobody in Tehran has the authority to actually surrender.

The high cost of being half-right

Trump is right that "maximum pressure" has physically weakened Iran. The country is facing daily blackouts and a collapsed currency. But he’s wrong to think that weakness leads to a deal. Historically, the Iranian regime doubles down when cornered. They view a ceasefire as a trap that would only give the US and Israel time to reload.

The regional players aren't waiting for a Washington-led solution anymore. The GCC states—Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar—are caught in the crossfire. They’ve condemned Iranian violations of their sovereignty, yet they’re terrified that a total regime collapse in Tehran would send millions of refugees across the Gulf and ignite a sectarian fire they can't put out.

If you’re waiting for a clean ending to this war by the end of the month, don't hold your breath. The most likely scenario isn't a signed treaty in Oman; it's a long, grinding stalemate where Iran continues to bleed the global economy while the US continues to play whack-a-mole with missile sites.

To actually move the needle, the focus needs to shift from seeking "capitulation" to managing the chaos of a post-Khamenei Iran. This means providing a realistic path for the Iranian opposition that doesn't involve a total foreign-imposed government, and acknowledging that as long as the war continues, the risk of a nuclear-armed, desperate regime actually increases rather than decreases.

Keep a close eye on the March 27 deadline. If it passes without a deal, expect the strikes to move from military targets to the power grid, pushing the region into a humanitarian crisis that no carrier strike group can solve.

AC

Ava Campbell

A dedicated content strategist and editor, Ava Campbell brings clarity and depth to complex topics. Committed to informing readers with accuracy and insight.